The best we can hope for, therefore, is our best attempt at nature conservation – to help the maximum number of desirable species reproduce and thrive in any given region.
To many, “M” might seem like a random letter plucked from thin air by Ian Fleming during a spell of writer’s block; a fictional character. It was, of course, anything but, as the two men (Ian Fleming and Maxwell Knight) were in the security service at the same time, and “M’s” talents as a spy handler were revered by Fleming and his MI5 colleagues. Not only did Fleming base the character of “M” on Maxwell Knight he also gave him the initial, the essential insignia, which must have come as quite a shock to Maxwell Knight. If there’s any doubt about this, watch On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, 1969. James Bond (George Lazenby) interrupts “M” (Bernard Lee) whilst he’s looking at his butterfly collection with a hand lens – in his bug room:
“Unusually small for a Nymphalis Polychloris,” says Bond looking over M’s shoulder.
“I wasn’t aware that your expertise included lepidoptery,” replies “M”.
Write what you know; Fleming knew that “M” would be a compelling character to counterbalance the ego of Bond.
“Wildlife’s continued decline highlights the urgent need for sustainable solutions to humanity’s increasing demand on our natural resources,” reports WWF and ZSL in the Living Planet Report.
Professor Ken Norris, Director of Science at the Zoological Society of London said: “The scale of biodiversity loss and damage to the very ecosystems that are essential to our existence is alarming. This damage is not inevitable but a consequence of the way we choose to live. Although the report shows the situation is critical, there is still hope. Protecting nature needs focused conservation action, political will and support from businesses.”
We have been on this destructive course for quite some time; it takes time, determination and a certain amount of ignorance to consume Mother Nature’s gifts – but we are managing to do so, one chunk at a time.
The Living Planet Report 2014 is the tenth edition of WWF’s biennial flagship publication. The report uses the Living Planet Index – a database maintained by the Zoological Society of London which tracks over 10,000 vertebrate species populations from 1970 to 2010. The index reveals a continued decline in these populations and this global trend is not slowing down.
Maxwell Knight was aware of the furore and criticism from chemical companies and others when Rachel Carson published her book Silent Spring in 1962. Indeed, he credits her work in his unpublished manuscript. She wasn’t the only one in those years who drew attention to environmental problems and was criticised for not being “proper scientists”; however, her work was (is still) seminal.
Maxwell Knight was openly an amateur naturalist; however, so was Sir Peter Scott; Gerald Durrell and Charles Darwin. The first reason he did not publish this manuscript is that his publishers were divided – one thought it was the rantings of an amateur naturalist and the other believed the claims to be unscientific. What his publisher couldn’t have known at the time was how prescient the observations were.
The main reason, however, is fear of being branded a communist; Chemical companies condemned Rachel Carson’s findings as flawed and defended DDT by saying that it would be impossible to feed a country without pesticides. Her opponents were
many; she was accused of dreadful things including communism. Had Maxwell Knight received the same attention, the impact could have been far-reaching.
In 1962 the western world was in a “Cold War” with the Soviet Union and he could not have risked being branded with the same iron Miss Carson was (unfairly) branded with ‘unpatriotic and sympathetic to communism’. Given his MI5 status and the fact that four of the Cambridge “Five” Spies (Maclean, Burgess, Philby, Blunt and eventually years later John Cairncross) – recruited by Stalin’s agents in the 50s – had been exposed by 1964. Add to this that Knight was amongst the first to warn MI5 that it had been infiltrated by the soviets (he wrote a paper entitled ‘The Comintern Is Not Dead’, sharing his fears about the potential danger of the NKVD).
It could just have been bad timing:
In 1964, five years before the moon landing, governments were spending their time and money focusing on projects that would continue to pummel nature and perhaps he simply felt that the 60s weren’t going to be the decade in which to encourage the planet’s occupants to be kinder. The world was rather preoccupied with The Soviet Union’s “Space Race” and America’s rebuttal with the “moon programme”, and all manner of changes that might have felt alien to a man like Knight, including the period of radical political change in Africa – where Knight focuses a good deal of his manuscript’s attention – as the thirty-two countries gained independence from its European colonial rulers.
Whatever the reason, Knight locked away The Frightened Face of Nature in his filing cabinet for the very last time at some point before his death in 1968, and there it sat – with a rich seam of national and natural history, until 2015.
The purpose behind sharing the filing cabinet’s contents is to encourage debate on the state of the world’s nature. We think Maxwell Knight would have approved.
Knight the pioneer:
How did ‘bird gardening’ become established in British life? Simon King reveals its origins in the ideas and writing of the famous WW2 spy catcher – none other than Maxwell Knight.
The practice of putting out food for birds in gardens is more popular now than ever before, with more than half the UK population feeding birds on a regular basis. Bird food companies have responded to the public interest by producing a range of diets and accessories; from bird tables to squirrel-proof feeders. In short, “bird gardening” has become big business.
But how did this all start? For how long have British people been enjoying the company of birds in their gardens by attracting them with (rather than for) food? Individuals, probably naturalists and eccentrics have most likely fed wild birds for centuries; however, the (bird) table has literally and figuratively turned – birds are now seen as our garden guests.
At what point in popular culture, though, did feeding the birds become a more informed pastime? When did feeding the birds for “tuppence a bag” leap from stale bread and leftover table-top offerings to “best practice” and metamorphose into the more formal bird gardening approach we practice today?
It is difficult to be sure but a good starting point to wild bird feeding as we know it today is the book “Bird Gardening. How to Attract Birds” written by Maxwell Knight in 1954. Older readers will remember Knight as one of the radio personalities who appeared on such programmes as “Nature Parliament” and “The Naturalist” in the 1950s. He was an enigmatic character; as documents are now revealing, he played an important part in MI5 in the Second World War and (as a friend and colleague of Ian Fleming, whom he recruited to MI5) was probably the inspiration for “M” in what has become one of Hollywood’s most successful film franchises, James Bond.
On the flysheet of “Bird Gardening …” the publishers wrote: “Most people like having birds in their gardens, but few know the best way of supplying their needs as to food and nesting. In this book advice is given as to how and when to erect nesting boxes and the subject of bird tables and feeding birds at all seasons is examined thoroughly. The problem of improving gardens so as to make them more attractive to birds is dealt with, and even the difficulties of protecting birds from cats, squirrels, and other predators is considered. The book is illustrated with pencil sketches by Jean Armitage, who also contributed to the wealth of advice contained in this essential book for all bird lovers.”
It’s likely to be a revelation to many readers that, one of the modern-day, founding fathers of bird gardening (Maxwell Knight) was once a World War II spy catcher who, inter alia, foiled a plot to stop the Americans entering the war and whose MI5 department, B5(b) immobilised Britain’s “fifth column” of Nazi sympathisers, and yet Knight’s unique observational field work skills were put to work in service of natural history too; organising and presenting best practice for would be bird gardeners and nature enthusiasts.
“Stale cake – particularly plain cake – is better than bread if it can be spared”, wrote Knight – reflecting the period (post war). Today’s garden birds are presented with a plethora of bird diets and treats that have moved on dramatically (and scientifically) since Knight’s time, even Marie Antoinette’s “let them eat cake” cries have been surpassed by the best and most progressive bird food specialists. High-energy peanuts and sunflower hearts bursting with calories, high-fat suet offerings of all shapes and sizes – even no-mess bird seed mixes, where all the seeds and husks have been carefully removed to leave the goodness intact for the convenience of garden birders so that they no longer have to sweep up waste husks. Paradoxically, however, there are garden birds that get enrichment from the rolling action of cracking open seed husks – birds like the Greenfinch for example. These and other observational feeding challenges are all in a day’s work for today’s dedicated bird gardeners.
In “Bird gardening…” Knight pays tribute to the Americans as bird feeding pioneers; however, the British, with their long history of creating and tending gardens, played a significant part in promoting the concept and were probably responsible for the introduction of the term “bird gardening”. Haith’s – one of Britain’s most knowledgeable bird food specialists – says that their records show how food has been provided for wild bird feeding since the late 30s. However, at some point around the 50s, bird gardening stepped forward and announced this is how to do it well and do it safely.
In Knight’s “Feeding Birds in Winter” (1957) he remarks that this congenial task is a pleasure for much of the year, “but a duty in hard weather.” What Knight couldn’t possibly know in the 50s and 60s was that bird gardening would become increasingly popular as a year-round pastime, with more and more enthusiasts electing to feed throughout the summer months. What he did spot, though, was that there was a right and wrong way to go about bird gardening, and the wrong way would inevitably affect birds’ welfare.
Welfare is never too far away in Knight’s written work – indeed, one hitherto unpublished work recently discovered inside his personal filing cabinet – owned by John and Margaret Cooper – documents his concerns for wildlife population declines on a global stage; it’s about the depredations of humans and industry on the world of nature, which is why the manuscript was entitled The Frightened Face of Nature.
Welfare and what to feed went hand in hand for Knight; in terms of bird gardening, his focus was on food selection and how to best present it as safe offerings to the birds. In this respect, he was ahead of his time. For example, Knight encouraged bird gardeners to bring food in every night to prevent mice or even rats from feasting on the food. In terms of food selection, he championed food safety and was unafraid to neither stand up and be counted nor admit when he was wrong… One such published example documents that in Knight’s time, the use of coconut as a food source for garden birds was controversial. Coconut returned to the market after the war, and bird gardeners saw it as an ideal food source. Initially, Knight agreed – but was met with opposition from his readers and listeners, so soon gave the advice to “never give any kind of shredded or desiccated coconut” to the birds (Knight, 1957; Knight, undated). Further, he suggested a use for coconuts that is still in service today: “Saw the complete coconut into two halves and hang up – open end downwards. When empty, the shells can be filled with fat and used in this way as containers.”
Today, bird food companies like Haith’s (see www.haiths.com) are joined by leading wildlife charities (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Wildlife Trusts, British Trust for Ornithology) in stating that bird gardening is good for humans and good for birds. Knight would be pleased to hear how feeding Niger seed has helped swell Goldfinch populations so much that they are now a common sight on bird feeders across the UK.
There remains little doubt that Britain’s birds are the beneficiaries of people power. However, with power comes great responsibility – one such responsibility is bird garden hygiene.
Attracting large numbers or groups of birds and encouraging them to gather in one place to feed requires good animal husbandry to reduce the hazards of cross contamination. Thankfully many forward thinking bird food companies like Haith’s have sensibly mitigated the risk by educating the bird gardener to take some sensible precautions to reduce the potential for spreading pathogens. This is best achieved by 1) regular cleaning of bird-tables and other feeding areas, 2) providing high-quality bird food. Companies are increasingly aware of the need to produce such diets if the health of garden birds is not to be compromised (Cooper, 2012), (3) not overfeeding birds (they need to look for food in the garden and hedgerows, not to depend solely on human intervention), and 4) hand-washing and, if possible, wearing gloves if handling sick or dead birds.
Our gardens have become a haven for wild birds that have been displaced from our countryside. Wherever the term bird gardening appeared from and whoever was first responsible for using it, one thing is incontrovertible: Maxwell Knight – the real-life “M” and BBC Natural History broadcaster – helped open our hearts to birds and wildlife detection and – as long as we continue to remain a nation of nature lovers – bird gardening seems likely to be here to stay. It gives much pleasure to those involved and arguably both helps to augment the nutritional status and promote survival of many wild birds.
Simon King gratefully acknowledges the contribution of Prof John E. Cooper and Margaret Cooper in preparing this article.
This article was published in Cage & Aviary Birds, Feb 17, 2016 and is used here with the kind permission of Rob Innes – Editor, Cage & Aviary Birds
Cooper, JE (2012). The Case for Greater Quality Control. Lecture given to the British
Veterinary Zoological Society at its Spring Meeting, April 21 2012, Slimbridge,
Gloucestershire. Cage & Aviary Birds June 13 2012, p.6.
Knight, M. (1954). Bird Gardening. How to Attract Birds. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Republished (1975) by Ian Henry Publications, Hornchurch, Essex.
Knight, M (1957). Feeding Birds in Winter. Leaflet produced by the RSPB, Sandy, Bedfordshire.
Knight, M (undated). The Coconut Controversy and other Bird Feeding Matters. Bird Notes XXVI, No 3, pp.71-73, Sandy, Bedfordshire.
Maxwell Knight was amongst the original founders of the Camberley Natural History Society in 1946.
Copyright: see acknowledgements